Cool Playgrounds

A friend of mine (Brent Goerz) sent me these links today for sustainable, creative playgrounds and resources on playground philosophy and design... what amazing ideas and articles! Some of the design ideas are just cool to look at, but many of them would work in a winter city like ours. As Brent put it, "this is from an architect out of TO who uses these options to provide an alternative to plastic crap in schools."

Worth the visit:
http://www.earthartist.com/playground/KOLTS.pdf
http://naturalplaygrounds.com/news.php
http://www.bpfp.org/PlaygroundDesign/

Issue #10 Real Sustainability

Problems:

Schools support communities and neighbourhoods, and have a duty to be responsible community players. Over the last 10 years we’ve seen our school grounds increasingly chained up, gated, and made less welcome for neighbours. Friendly users are given the message to keep out, leaving the schools alone to the vandals. These are public lands, and should be open to the public.

Sustaining communities also means being stewards of our resources. Useful surplus equipment (e.g. from closed schools) should not be thrown out, but recycled or donated. It is still not known what has happened to surplus sewing machines, stoves, fridges, pottery and shop equipment from schools closed in 2010.  Either they have been thrown out or their whereabouts have not been properly reported.  The disposal was done quietly and kept out of the press.  Outrageous - this wasn’t junk - these were valuable assets in good repair according to staff from John McInnis and Lakewood. What is known is that hundreds of computers have been thrown out over the last two years, aging but still of use if the district didn't block donations. The issue of a principal throwing out school supplies was in the media this year, but that appears to be an isolated event rather than a pattern.

We need to recover carbon. Currently, school groups that organize efforts to green their school grounds are discouraged, being told that mown grass is preferable to trees and natural vegetation. Our district pays $150,000 per year (? please confirm) in carbon taxes based on the size of its footprint. The Highglen Montessori solar panel project is good start - Dave Leman’s efforts show us an example of something our school district should be prioritizing.

Some of our school groups have attempted to green their school grounds, like install gardens or replant trees that were cut down during the Pine Beetle outbreak. They are told that it is too expensive to do groundskeeping around new plantings, and most of these projects are denied. School grounds can be a place of wonder and beauty for students, and a lot of this has to do with trees. A few trees have been successfully planted, but we should be talking about stands of trees, little forests - thinking 100 years ahead!

Solutions:

Engage neighbourhoods and make use of social capital (the power of motivated people). Imagine how productive the board and board office could be if they became less adversarial with parent groups and said yes more often. Allow municipalities to assume after-hours liability in school grounds if that is why the chains and gates have gone up, and send the message that public school grounds are common ground.

Be public, open, and honest about what happens when a school closes. Donate, repurpose, or auction all surplus equipment and do not throw out usable assets. Appoint a trustee, PAC, or DPAC member to monitor disposal of assets. Our district has gained the reputation of being wasteful and it will take some serious effort to correct this impression.

We need to be more aggressive in reducing our carbon emissions and footprint, perhaps even recovering credits by sponsoring an offset project. To register these with the Pacific Carbon Trust, they would have to be completed by a third party to qualify as schools are currently excluded. They also need to involve something new that didn’t already exist in some form. Installation of outdoor learning space that involves carbon-capturing features (like trees) would qualify. 

Encourage tree planting and garden projects at many school sites in the district. Many of these projects already have volunteer help and funding lined up, so this does not have to be a new expenditure. Look beyond just making school grounds attractive and look for connections for environmental education and outdoor learning spaces.


Offer small incentives for teachers and schools to involve students in greening projects. What a great accomplishment it would be for a student to be involved with an innovative carbon capture project or the start of a new urban forest.

BCPSEA application & job action

Recently, the trustees/government bargaining group (BCSPEA) submitted an application to the Labour Relations Board to deduct 15% pay from teachers in order to balance the job action and put some pressure on the BCTF to give up demands at the bargaining table. I don't support this move. It is crazy to suggest that staff meetings (2 hours/month), supervision (1/2 hour/week), and official report cards (maybe 4-5 hours four times a year) constitute 15% of a teacher's workload. My husband, a teacher, figures that works out to about $250 for a staff meeting. I hope he is getting his money's worth! In reality, teaching is a professional that consumes evenings and weekends, parts of summer and Christmas break, and is focused on the students in class, a passion for their subject, and not the meetings or the hallway supervision. As a parent, I've been able to meet with my child's teacher, and my teacher is no less busy preparing and teaching her class. She has to find her own time to offer a recess break, and supervise it herself outside of the school's regular supervision schedule. This article helps tell the story a little better than I can.

Issue #5 The Student Experience

Problem: 

Schools have a hard job balancing academic achievement, fine arts, respect for diversity, support for struggling or challenged learners; they generally do well but areas of concern remain.  One of them is ensuring that special needs support is not diverted due to budget constraints. Funds generated specifically for special needs students often get spread across other school programs (and without a requirement to notify parents). While support in unfunded areas is needed and appreciated (like providing TAs in other classes for struggling students that do not have special designations), this shouldn’t come at a cost to the special needs students whose presence in a school generated those funds to begin with.

Another concern is the loss to elective programs. Fine arts and applied skills are seen as “bonus” programs at elementary schools (most have them, but no guarantees), and at secondary schools have been pushed off of student’s timetables in return for core classes such as math. A controversial pilot started last year adds a mandatory term of math for every Grade 8 student, regardless of ability, and a cost to electives. This was done to address deficits in early math education that eventually show up on the Math 10 provincial exam.

Solutions:

Principals should publish for their staffs and public how their special education funding is allocated, and invite discussion and feedback on how best to support all learners with limited funds. When it becomes clear that funding shortfalls exist, this need to be passed on by trustees to the Ministry of Education.

The emphasis should be on supporting math teaching and learning in the elementary level, not taking away the well-rounded set of course that students look forward to in high school. Students with problems in math should get targeted help, rather than simply throwing more time in math class at every student.  We have great math teachers, but there is only so much time for students to experience a variety of subjects and find their passion. Missing out on electives in Grade 8 will means that electives programs in later grades may not attract the students needed for the program to thrive. It is the electives that often give students a chance to excel and connect to something they will pursue for the rest of their life.

Rick Mercer on Teen Suicide

"It gets better" sometimes isn't good enough. See the story at http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2011/10/26/pov-mercer.html

The Learning Agenda

On a facebook forum for rural schools solutions (CORES), one of the trustee candidates brought up the BC government's plans to transform education and our school district's endorsement. 21st century learning, personalized, flexible, empowered by technology, better teachers & standards, allows parents to choose what, where, how, and when their kids learn. In response, I'd have to say that the "Learning Agenda" needs to be seen in more detail. "21st Century Learning" means too many things to be at the centre of a plan. For some, it means critical thinking and problem-solving, or collaboration and creativity, for others it means more distance education and use of technology. Some of those things belong in any century, and are already "normal" in our schools. The where/when part speaks to the goal for more distance education, phased in as students approach Grade 12. As a parent, I am not interested in having my child learn about math or social studies by staying home and looking up helpful websites on a cell phone. This would be a difficult option for working parents. I want my kids to learn, websites or not, in the presence of a teacher who can guide & instruct and other students with whom they interact. There are some successful "blended" models for delivering distance education, but we're not there yet in SD57, our correspondence courses have very low success rates. Making improvements there is very much needed if distance education can be used to support rural communities. Our schools and teachers are not always perfect but squeezing out the students for distance courses as they approach graduation will not make them better. More parental involvement sounds good but the reality is that most working parents are quite content to send their kids to school and trust that they are learning. Do many parents (outside of home-schooling) actually want to design their kid's educational experience? Choosing a school or program (like Montesorri) yes, but curriculum and learning activities? Our teachers are already very good at this. I am absolutely committed and deeply involved in my kids' education, but I have more than enough opportunity to interact with their teachers and affect how and when they learn. I think the "Learning Agenda" is not so much flexibility as it is privatizing education. It seems to be a recipe for downgrading public school until we end up with a two-tiered education system. There are some really good things that can come from changes to the system, but our own district has a big problem in that many of the "21st Century Learning" ideas that teachers want to pursue are stopped by board office policy. The disconnect between the teachers and the board office has deepened over the last few years and is quite obvious during the current job action. Sorting out and bringing in the "Learning Agenda" will not succeed unless this disconnect can be addressed. This will be a hard task for trustees, but it needs to be on the agenda. I look forward to the challenge.